Community Policing

In my eyeshot to understand the way things are today you must initial understand the history and background. So with that being said I would arrive off the class with the history and background of policing. The modern concept of legal philosophy was started in London in 1829 by Robert despoil. Robert Peel felt that the uprightness should be responsible up to the prosecution phase moreover the essay, doctrine and punishment phase should be the responsibility of another party. However, Robert Peels approach and residential area policing one thing is the main goal and thats prevention of crimes. http//voices. yahoo. com/law-en multitudement-sir-robert-peels-concept-community-638595. html) I would then go into the times for mend which occurred in the late 1800s. I would contend American history which was divided into three geological eras. These three eras were the political era, the ameliorate era and the community policing era. The political era this occurred from 1840 to 1930. This foc apply on close ties amidst constabulary and politicians as soundly as first emphasis on making politicians happy. Next was the reform era that occurred from 1930 to 1970.This focus on professional crime fighting and ensure were the main focus of police. Then last was community policing from 1970 and is unruffled used today. The focus of this era was partnership between police and the community. (http//www. grossmont. edu/lance. parr/intro4. htm) Community policing and conundrum solving gives the public an fortune to ply with police in monastic order to prevent crimes. In conclusion our country has continued to follow Robert Peels root words of effective policing. Before policing can be effective the community and the police must work together to shape this happen.Peel believed that the police are the people and the people are the police. (http//voices. yahoo. com/law-enforcement-sir-robert-peels-concept-community-638595. html) References http//voices. yahoo. com/law-enforcement-sir-robert-peels-concept-community-638595. html http//www. grossmont. edu/lance. parr/intro4. htm Community Policing and occupation solution by J. Peak 2012 Summarize the three eras of policing (political, reform, and community). Identify and briefly discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each era. do in no less than 300 words. The three eras of policing are political, reform and community. Each new era brought forth something different to the police force. In 1844 New York establishes a police force for New York City. unalike others this police force was different. The city g overnment and politicians had control of the police force even as far as selecting officers. This era was cognize as the political era. This meant there were close ties between the police force and politicians. The main goal was to make the politicians happy.In 1930 the political era became the reform era. This era focused mainly on the arrest of individuals which meant profession al crime fighting. Officers were to enforce the laws and make arrest whenever possible. When bigger problems arose a excess type of unit was delegate instead of assigning an officer to a case. During the professional or reform era crime began to rise, fear in people arose, minorities did not buzz off their treatment by police adequate or equitable, and police began to be in competition with one another.This era was about to end and a new one began. In 1970 a new era began which was k immediatelyn as community policing. This focused on a partnership between police and the community. At this time it was suggested that patrol officers performance would ameliorate by reorganizing the jobs based on the officers. This later became known as team policing. The idea of team policing was to restructure the departments, improve police-community relations, enhance police officer morale, and still change in the police organization.Now with the new era in tail a system was developed c wholly ed COPPS which means Community Oriented Policing and Problem Solving. The community and police officers working together to prevent crime is now the culture to m any police organizations. I believe that the era that work best for police organizations is the community era this gives police and the community the opportunity to work together to prevent crimes which should be the main focus. (Ken Peak 2003 prof of criminal justice) References http//www. policechiefmagazine. org/magazine/index. cfm? useaction=display_arch&article_id=1968&issue_id=122009 1. What were the primary findings and testimonials of the Wickersham Commission? What changes resulted from these recommendations? How did the work of O. W. Wilson, August Vollmer, and J. Edgar Hoover shape up reform policing in this era? Respond in no less than 250 words. President Hoover created the Wickersham Commission because of arguments over prohibition and the citizens concerns on crime incr restd. The Chicago gang wars a nd the Valentines mean solar day Massacre brought on most of the concerns from citizens.Hoovers idea of the Wickersham Commission was to improve the notably ineffective enforcement of prohibition. A list of Wickershams conclusions and recommendations was provided to try and ease the concerns of citizens. The tutelage is opposed to repeal of the eighteenth amendment, to the restoration in any manner of the legalized saloon, to the federal or state governments such as handout into the liquor business, to the proposal to modify the National Prohibition exploit so as to permit manufacture and sale of light wines and beer.The bearing is of opinion that the cooperation of the states is an essential element in the enforcement of the eighteenth amendment and the National Prohibition Act throughout the territory of the United States that the support of public opinion in the several states is necessary in order to insure such cooperation. The consignment is of opinion that prior to the enactment of the delegacy of Prohibition Act, 1927 the agencies for enforcement were badly nonionised and inadequate that subsequent to the enactment there has been continued improvement in organization and effort for enforcement.The foreign mission is of opinion that the present organization for enforcement is still inadequate. The commission is of opinion that the federal appropriations for enforcement of the eighteenth amendment should be substantially change magnitude and that the vigorous and better organized efforts which have gone on since the Bureau of Prohibition Act, 1927, should be furthered by certain improvements in the statutes and in the organization, force-out and equipment of enforcement, so as to give enforcement the greatest practicable efficiency.Some of the commissions were not positive(p) that prohibition under the eighteenth is unenforceable and believe that a further trial should be made with the help of the recommended improvements, and that if after s uch trial effective enforcement is not secured there should be a revision of the amendment. Others of the commission were convinced of the opposite they believed that it has been demonstrated that prohibition under the 18th amendment is unenforceable and that the amendment should be immediately revised.The commissions did agree that if the amendment were to be revised it would read remotion of the causes of irritation and resentment on the part of the medical profession by The commission concluded by doing away with the statutory fixing of the standard which may be prescribed and the number of prescriptions, abolition of the requirement of specifying the distemper for which liquor is prescribed upon a blank to go into the public fly leaving as much as possible to ruler preferably than fixing details by statue.The commission also concluded that the removal of the anomalous provisions in section 29, National Prohibition Act, as to cider and fruit juices by making some uniform reg ulation for a fixed alcoholic content. Increase of the number of agents, storekeepers-gaugers, prohibition investigators, and special agents increase in the personnel of the Customs Bureau and in the equipment of all enforcement organizations. The commission concluded that the enactment of legislation to prohibit independent denaturing plants.The commission is opposed to legislation allowing more latitude for federal searches and seizures. The commission renews its recommendation of legislation for making procedure in the so-called padlock enjoining cases more effective. The commission recommends legislation providing a mode of prosecuting petty offenses in the federal courts and modifying the Increased Penalties Act of 1929, as set forth in the chairmans letter to the attorney general dated whitethorn 23, 1930. The commission met from 1929 to 1930 to work out the kinks in the recommendations and conclusions the final report was issued in 1931.The commission focused a lot on manufa cturing and sales of liquor. The commission stated in the report that the eighteenth amendment should not be repealed but the government should spend more money and effort enforcing prohibition laws. (http//ehistory. osu. edu/osu/mmh/ friction/prohibition/Documents/wickershamreport. htm) References http//ehistory. osu. edu/osu/mmh/clash/prohibition/Documents/wickershamreport. htm http//legal-dictionary. thefreedictionary. com/Wickersham+Commission According to