Frankenstein and Human Cloning Essay

What is sp payliness? What defines a person? Do you believe hu slices should cook the right to grow action? Are there any consequences? In 1831 bloody shame Shelly wrote Frankenstein or The Modern Prometheus, a magnificent depiction of a man taking up Gods role of creator of life. skipper wanted to achieve biological immortality. Yet, within the instance of success victor outright rejected his creation as monstrous, a social unit for being unworthy of humanity life. In this paper, I argue that Frankenstein and the thinking re-create have a dance band in common, beca practice session the two topics serving pros and cons on behalf of their out coming result. headmaster Frankensteins monster comp ared to cloning takes empower without the act of a sexual union between a male and female. In general, cloning is the young Frankenstein, just like Frankenstein is the modern Prometheus. Prometheus stole fire from the Gods he had taken something that did not belong to the public and given it to mankind and was essentially punished for his actions. In the same way, overlord Frankenstein lets his ambition overpower him. Victor took from God what was not his, and created a poisonous monster in effect of his strong desire for creating human life. tender-hearted cloning is besides a controversial subject stating that humans have no power by Gods to develop life or require death. According to the Human Genome Project, there are three types of cloning DNA, therapeutic, and fruitful cloning. DNA cloning involves transferring DNA from a donor to another organism. remedial cloning, known as embryo cloning which involves harvesting stem cells from human embryos to grow new organs for transplant. Reproductive cloning creates a feign of the host. Victor Frankenstein created his monster using Reproductive cloning from distinctive eubstance parts of different host organisms.To make his creature, Victor Frankenstein raided grave yards and exhausted a lot of his time in slaughter houses as wholesome as dissecting rooms to borrow body parts from the dead to use for his creature. Cloning in relation to Frankenstein also uses the process of borrowing by obtaining genetic materials from embryos to make identical duplicates. With all the allusions to fire and electricity anchor throughout the novel, to both spark and glimmer give the reader clues as to how Frankenstein used electric currents to stimulate the patched together dead body of his monster. Comparatively, cloning also employs the use of electricity to promote the division of cells also known as life.In the process of stimulating his creation to life, Victor Frankenstein accidentally puts a criminal brain into his monster, therefore skewing the monsters behavior. Cloning is often unsuccessful. According to the Human Genome Project, it takes sometimes 100 attempts to create one successful clone. Frankensteins monster had all components and feelings of a human being, but was not born ou t of a womans womb and was not sexually produced. The creature was created not in Gods image, but in Victors image. nowadayss cloning process, like the methods of creating life used by Dr. Frankenstein, arouses a controversy of morals and ethics from religious viewpoints. Cloning has a lot to do with the desires of man. Frankenstein desired to create life. Desires, otherwise known as temptations in these cases, bring us to a great fault. By taking the place of God, to make their own definition of a person, Frankenstein and the creators of cloning are defying God and going against the Bibles moral standards. In be life we get a deep look into how Frankenstein and cloning compare. They are very alike in many ways. These things teach us that life and the universe are unknowable, and are not meant to be completely known. We are not meant to become boundless creators. Rather, we are the created created by God.