.

Thursday, December 13, 2018

'Contemporary Globalization Essay\r'

' ar you a forerunner of the so called Contemporary orbicularization or in your view point do you adhere to Global Diversity? This short motif is to review globalisation developments and their imp phone numbers or impressions whether is it a panic to hu servicemankindkind dignity in terms of providing a safer work place and leisure to man and go out it promotes republic and justice for all (Johnston, Mont 2000)? globalization began in the 70’s and reaches all the corners of the piece by dint of the creation of IMF, the World Bank and, WTO.\r\nGlobalization was in like manner brought about by the advance communication engineering and collapse of communism (Johnston, Mont 2000). According to the Canadian essence Council (CUC), â€Å"globalization does non account of the right of conscience, and democracy is besides hearsay. Trade fundamentalist works with merged lawyers to develop trade rules which expressly exclude condition of the environment and human being s rights in favor of invert on investments, consideration on the rights of another(prenominal)s are save taken into consideration but in droll circumstances”.\r\nFor this reason, the Council created seven principles of the UUs covenants to counter act or to balance the wave of globalization which is detrimental to the Unitarian way of thinking in which it firmly believes that singularity of every person moldiness be reverentially acknowledge preserving his farming. It is in novelty that a echt human society is born. Globalization spread the culture of homogenous market and consumerism; it limits human choices beca do human set are fixed by market determine. Manfred Steger except stated globalism in his curb A unused Market Ideology as â€Å"globalony”.\r\nConsequences or impacts of Globalization: Neoliberals or the globalist supported their claims on the following policy-making orientation: Globalization is market integration, inevitable and irreversib le, none is in-charge and it would attain everyone, and impart further spread democracy. These are strategies in order to promote private interests of dominant a a few(prenominal)(prenominal) to be supported by the general public. These claims were conservatively screend by Steger as he insisted that we postulate to critically understand what are globalism, ideology, and globalization which are a process of globalism.\r\nHe also pointed out that it is not only enough to examine its economic import but its ideas and care fors (Walker 2003). It is a hard justness to accept that the human will are dictated by market trends which mean that human comforts are being replaced by market value or the limiting of our choices which is contrary to the free act of man. Corporations swallow extended on a global scale, 51 among top companies are run by the wealthiest 100 multinationals (Carmichael 2002).\r\nSteger asserted that it is undemocratic because the influence of the supranatio nal bodies will decrease the ability of national governments to foil multinational corporations. Wiwa in his audience with law students assign that â€Å"The governance are no drawn-out for the bring in of the citizens, as it should be, but for corporate profit. Decisions reflect only what corporations want (Carmichael 2002)”. Anything that gets in their way must be removed at all costs, no interrogate there could be a time that man will be replaced by robots.\r\nFor man to survive, diversity is needed but regimes like the WTO has modeled globalization which resulted into a homogenous culture of consumerism. It sees that diversity is an cheque to the free trade. One example is the over-produced food that flood the developing countries; it forces small farmers to abandon their farms to work for Nike and other corporations. Mexican farmer’s earnings wee declined by 40%. Poverty radically sum ups musical composition the stocks of multinationals increases.\r\nKen Wiwa a physician and an author of the book â€Å"Dance the guns to Silenceâ€Å"was hanged in November 1995 for his crusade against globalization and today it is his brother Owen who continues by addressing a political science class at the University of Toronto about the consequence of globalization saying â€Å"You have that paradox whereby an increase in transnational corporations in the south will increase the poverty and conflict and wars in that bucolic and Ten years from now you may be working in these corporations and governments so it is up to you to pass an influence â€Å"(Carmichael 2002).\r\nShell Corporation and the Ogoni people go about the dilemma between the clearing of its oil spills and the MOSOP accomplishment of the Ogoni People for Survival in the 1990s. Oil ancestry in their country is to the detriment of its inhabitants. Sickness think to air and water pollution like asthma and other diseases outnumbered the hospital built in 1993. though the compan y has left the premises they have not really removed their pipelines nor cleaned up and paid payment to their workers. The company remained quiet and the military was no longer engaged but arrest started Wiwa stated (Carmichael 2002).\r\n base on the above consequences, Steger’s touches the tenets of his argument that it is the human will and choices that must create market models and not the goods or the reverse wherein market limits suppressed human choices. His argument was based on the historical facts that man lords over the earth and that no society have emerged without knowing how to take care of its own. Society degrades or falls when only a privileged few are protected, when dominance is instilled prejudices and other sisters of greed appears. The value of human work diminishes and man begins to serve only his appetite and whims.\r\nIndeed, we must account for the gifts we received such(prenominal) as the talents endowed to us. There is a need of strengthening our w orld communities to use collective condition to develop alternatives to Globalization and Corporate Rule. We must examine and challenge ourselves what is behind each ideology and must patronize products and services that are truly for the benefit of mankind. We must put our best efforts that wealth is distributed equitably and for the common good. We must learn to scrutinize the use of worldly goods and sharpen our values to preserve the world and the future of the next generation.\r\nReferences\r\nMel Johnston, Alastair Mont, Philip Symons Calgary, Alberta 2000, the CUC Policy on Globalization, [Electronic Version]. Retrieved 01 February 2008 from, http://www. cuc. ca/social_responsibility/globalization. htm Teresa Walker 2003, Globalism: The New Market Ideology by Manfred Steger, [Electronic Version]. Retrieved 01 February 2008 from, http://www. logosjournal. com/walker. htm Stefanie Carmichael (2002). Owens Wiwa tackles consequences of globalization [Electronic Version]. The Ma nitoban. Retrieved 02, February 2008 from, http://www. themanitoban. com/2001-2002/0403/news_8. shtml\r\n'

No comments:

Post a Comment